1.) I did Whistler in 2022, trained just by riding my gravel bike and running. No crazy distances, just showed up in shape and healthy. I'm doing Whistler again this year, and will train the same.
2.) They really focus on the experience with other participants, and in this area blows Ironman away. The speakers are better and since you're just walking uphill, you have more opportunities to meet the other athletes. The majority of pre & post event gatherings are athletes only, if you are planning on having friends/family come see you. Volunteering could be a good option for them. For Whistler, there's a hotel surcharge of approx $1300 to get a single room. The finish line at the end has a similar feel to an Ironman finish, but much less spectators and athletes. The after party was fun too!
3.) It not as intense, but is more of a grind. Unlike a tri, you're doing the exact same movements (ie walking uphill) the entire time. Self care is critical. I'd say the event is more difficult than an Ironman, but the training is worse for an Ironman.
Quote:
But yes it is crazy. Especially when you can go and join a guided 3 week expedition and actually go climb a 7000m peak for less.
Agree. I've done a bunch of those types of climbs (Ecuador volcanoes, Aconcagua, Denali, others). 29029 is the same type of grind as a long summit day, but a bit safer and much less time off work. Not as exhilarating though.