>I domt know where the inability to have children comes into the equation.
Weren't you just narrowly defining sex to be something that only happens between heterosexual couples, and using that definition as a necessary condition for marriage?
Edit: OK, maybe I just assumed you were re-packing the sexual procreation argument, but maybe you weren't.
Weren't you just narrowly defining sex to be something that only happens between heterosexual couples, and using that definition as a necessary condition for marriage?
Edit: OK, maybe I just assumed you were re-packing the sexual procreation argument, but maybe you weren't.