marcag wrote:
B_Doughtie wrote:
Whether he was offered or not offered a spot, no way he was going to go all in on the PTO.
Call me biased, but I think Lionel could give Sam [Long] a good run for his money.
You're biassed with a judgement not based on 2023 form, unless you use "could" in the context of a possibility (on the same start).
https://stats.protriathletes.org/...-long/lionel-sanders B_Doughtie wrote:
. . anything outside of top 5 is basically going on the premise of the "contract" being your primary income driver. So then it becomes in order to make 6 figures you need to go "all in" on the contract which then "disrupts" any other races. Sure you can "train through" an PTO event, but your also adding travel fatigue so it's not like you can just "train through" PTO events and secretly go all in on IM and then think your going to get the best of both worlds.
If the top 10 were getting $100k as the 'race 6 races' contract, the interviews given suggest the base contract was worth less for the 'top shots' in the #17-#20 slots: let's say $50k: ~$8k per race 'appearance' plus $2k+ for places #11-#20 plus $20k for 15th at the end of the year (a reasonable aspiration for Sanders): total remuneration = $85k.
How much will he win if he races as last year (about $25k), plus three competitive IMs?
But a contract with $85k walking through, plus IM winnings? Partner bonus criteria a factor?
First Sanders'll need to get a Kona slot which will not be easy in Texas but should be doable in IMLP (3MPRO and several will already be KQ).